What this is
Judged odds for what explains a ¥36.5bn one-off item in The Pokémon Company group’s accounts for the year to February 2026: about 45% that it is all Niantic.
How it’s built
- The research had said in advance that if the US arm was not named in Niantic’s later rounds, the Niantic odds should fall from about 0.6 toward 0.4.
- It was not named, but the test was weaker than planned, so the odds fell to 0.45.
- The rest: another investment in the group 30%, a currency effect 13%, something else 12%.
What we assumed
- Absence from press lists of later investors is only weak evidence.Press lists name lead and new investors; existing holders adding money would go unnamed, and the primary releases could not be opened.
- The probabilities are judgements.They update earlier judged odds; no document settles the question.
Sanity check
The firmer conclusion is that, under every route but ‘something else’, a one-off gain of ¥20–36.5bn after tax sat below the Tokyo company: about 88% likely.
Where it comes from
Our calculation from other figures in the trainer’s notes:
- ReportedSeries B: Niantic statement on investors, Series B (Nov 2017)
- EstimateA scale test
- Reported持分法 OCI by quarter: translation-only model on A-tier quarter-end rates (re-run of), year to March 2026, year to March 2026 Q1–Q4 (TPCi Jan–Dec 2025 translation dates)
- ReportedSeries B investor list (TPC/TPCi/Nintendo/Google named?), Series B (Nov 2017, $200m)
Show the working
- judgement on..9,,