What this is
A negative finding: no TV Tokyo document names The Pokémon Company as licensor or discloses how Pokémon rights fees are split, years to March 2017–2026.
How it’s built
- Searched TV Tokyo Holdings’ results presentations, earnings summaries, annual securities reports and half-year reports for the period.
What we assumed
Nothing. The figure is used as published.
Sanity check
Only a ranking of anime titles and wording that “royalty income grew” were found. Absence in the documents read does not prove absence everywhere.
The value
- not found
Where it comes from
The line in the source
(negative finding; no supporting quote)
In English
Negative: across every TV Tokyo document read (decks, 短信, 有報 renderings, 半期報告書) no sentence names the Pokémon Company as licensor and no 版権 fee split is disclosed; only the ranking and 'royalty income grew' wording