What this is
How much of the gap between two vendors' 2025 sales figures for pokemoncenter.com different definitions could explain: at most 1.32 times, leaving 1.99 times of a 2.632-times gap unexplained.
How it’s built
- ECDB reports only 'GMV' with no stated treatment of tax, shipping or returns; Grips excludes returns, subscriptions and app sales.
- Assume, in ECDB's favour, that it includes sales tax of about 8%, shipping of about 10% and returns of about 10%: (1.08 × 1.10) ÷ 0.90 = 1.32.
- 2.632 ÷ 1.32 = 1.99 remains.
What we assumed
- Tax of about 8%, shipping of about 10% and returns of about 10%, all counted by ECDB and none by Grips.Deliberately generous to a definitional explanation; neither vendor states these.
- App sales do not matter.No evidence was found of a material Pokémon Center app channel; this is a gap.
Sanity check
Definitions cannot plausibly explain a 2.6-times gap, so the difference lies in how each vendor measures or models sales.
Where it comes from
Our calculation from other figures in the trainer’s notes:
- EstimateHow Grips Intelligence, a web-sales data vendor, defines a store's revenue
- EstimateWhether Grips Intelligence's store sales figures net off returns
- Estimate1P only, 2026
- EstimateTax/shipping, 2026
- EstimateECDB definition, 2025
- EstimateECDB 1P/3P, 2025
Show the working
- Tax uplift: 1.08
- Shipping uplift: 1.1
- Returns share: 0.1
- Max definitional ratio: 1.32
- Unexplained residual ratio: 1.99
- Grips excludes returns, subscriptions, app sales
- own checkout only
- silent on tax/shipping
- ECDB says only 'GMV', 1P 100%, no tax/shipping/return